Resources
Every model, and which one to pick
Three video renderers, three image models — all available on every Wulo AI generation, right from the model picker next to the prompt box. Here's what actually differs between them, so picking one isn't a guess.
Video models
- Generates native audio alongside the video — dialogue, ambience, sound effects
- Fixed durations: 4, 8, 12, 16, or 20 seconds per segment
sora-2-prounlocks 1080p ("Cinematic" quality)- "Continue this clip" extends the story as a new same-length segment
- Strongest at physically accurate motion — weight, momentum, fluid dynamics
- Flexible durations, not locked to a fixed set like Sora
- "Continue this clip" genuinely extends the same take, not a new one
- 1080p available under Cinematic quality
- The only renderer here with a real 4K tier ("4k-sr")
- "Reference to video" mode — feed it up to 10 reference images and it weaves them into the scene, not just a single starting frame
- Two model tiers — 2.0 and 2.5 — flexible 4–30s durations
- Generates native audio alongside the video, like Sora
Side by side
| Model | Audio | Durations | Continue clip | Max quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sora 2 | Yes, native | 4 / 8 / 12 / 16 / 20s | Yes (new segment) | 1080p (pro) |
| Veo 3 | No | Flexible | Yes (true extend) | 1080p |
| Seedance | Yes, native | 4–30s | Not yet | 4K (4k-sr) |
A simple way to decide (video)
If the ad needs a voiceover or sound design baked into the render itself, Sora 2 or Seedance are the only two here that generate audio natively. If the shot depends on something moving convincingly — water, cloth, a crowd — Veo 3 tends to hold up best under scrutiny. If you need real 4K output or you're animating a specific character/product across multiple reference images, Seedance is the only one of the three that can do either.
Image models
All three cover the same style chips — Photoreal, Illustration, 3D render, Animation — the difference is which provider is actually rendering behind the scenes, and what that provider tends to be strongest at.
- Strongest of the three at rendering legible text inside the image itself
- Reliable prompt adherence for specific object counts, layouts, and composition
- Good general-purpose default across all four style chips
- Gemini's higher-fidelity image tier (
gemini-3-pro-image) - Worth the extra render time when the output is the final deliverable
- Gemini's faster, lighter image tier (
gemini-3.1-flash-image) - Cheapest way to try several prompt variations before committing to a final render
None of this is a permanent choice — every template and every generation lets you swap models per render, so trying the same prompt on two models costs nothing but time.
Pick a model right from the prompt box — no separate setup required.
Try it now